Wojciech Bońkowski
Master of Wine

In Tokaj (2): The grassroots revolution

Tokaj made its name on botrytised sweet wines, aszú, yet as mentioned in my previous post, these have fallen out of fashion and become notoriously difficult to sell both on the domestic market and export. As Tokaj has had to find a proper productive balance to survive at all – it’s actually a work in progress – the unthinkable has happened: it’s now possible to taste through several dozen Tokaj wines and climb to 90+ ratings without having a single botrytis wines on the table. It’s what happened to me last Friday when I met with the young up-and-coming vintners of the Tokaji Bormívelők Társarsága (that’s Tokaj Wine Artisans’ Society, you’ve guessed it, but let’s call it TBT hereafter).

Classified vineyards of Tokaj. © TBT (click for more info).

They’re a weird bunch really. Zsolt Berger was a business journalist before he came to Tokaj and started making wine out of the blue. Attila Homonna (see a brief entry about him here) was a successful marketing guy and then owned a wine shop in Debrecen but he got the Tokaj bug too; it’s all made remarkable by the fact that after 8 vintages made he’s still only 35. Judit Bodó (née Bott, which is the name of her winery) came from Slovakia without the merest experience in winemaking (though she’s travelled to vineyards in Alto Adige and South Africa to learn, on her own expenses); in the first couple of years of production her dry Furmints instantly propelled her into the regional superleague. There are arguably some very successful autodidacts in the wine world but nowhere in such high proportion.

The fact that it took a young generation with little or no background in winemaking to produce some of the most breathtaking dry wines in Tokaj is a paradox that one day, I hope, will become the subject of a sociological and psychological study. But it’s another fact that the heroes of the 1990s focused on the sweet wines and haven’t really come to terms with making world-class dries. (The situation is vaguely similar to that of port and dry Douro wines in Portugal). Sure, there have been some successful bottlings such as Oremus’ Burgundian Mandolás or János Árvay’s turbocharged (and excessive) single-vineyard Furmints, but it was not the breakthrough Tokaj needed to establish itself firmly on the great dry white wine map of the world.

Zsolt Berger tasting a luminous 2009.

It was István Szepsy, the region’s veteran and consistently the author of its greatest sweet aszús, who showed the way with his 2000 Úrágya Furmint. Old vineyards, low yields, ripe but unbotrytised grapes, oak fermentation, big structure (but balanced alcohol) and a touch of residual sugar to balance Furmint’s notoriously punchy acids: Szepsy’s recipe for success has now been developed by a large group of dedicated estates.

They all have a few points in common: they are small (‘boutique’ or ‘garage’ is a good descriptor here), own pockets of vines in Tokaj’s most prestigious vineyards (that were listed in 1700 in Europe’s earliest attempt at vineyard classification), make little or no sweet wine, and have an ambition of making Tokaj a great terroir white, rather than a FMCG marketable alternative to save the company cashflow. In 2006 the Artisans’ Society (TBT) was created: a list of classified crus was drawn, members meet, talk and taste together, agreeing on which submitted wines adhere to the strict criteria and the overall philosophy of the project. Those that pass the exam get the TBT logo. The system works a bit like the Grosses Gewächs one in Germany, and in due time will hopefully become the foundation for Tokaj’s official premiers and grands crus.

A happy TBT bunch: Hajnalka Prácser of Erszébet, Stéphanie Berecz of Kikelet, Sarolta Bárdos of Tokaj Nobilis with her 3-month-old daughter, Judit Bodó of Bott, and Zoltán Asztalos of Néktar. 

We’ve tasted some impossibly limpid, pithy, stoney-mineral 2007s and 2008s from Attila Homonna, and a very idiosyncratic 2008 Palandor Furmint from Karádi & Berger: peppery, violent, very volcanic indeed, with a rare expressiveness (the 2007 is a touch shier and there is also a 2003 Dry Szamorodni, essentially a mildly oxidative version of the same wine). We’ve tasted the impressive 2007 Öreg Király from Károly Barta, vinified by Homonna from high-perched terraces in this, perhaps Tokaj’s most majestic and uncompromisingly mineral cru. Béla Török showed some fun wines including a 2008 semi-dry Muscat of rarely seen minerality. Stéphanie & Zsolt Berecz from the Kikelet estate poured a delicious sweet 2007 Late Harvest but also my favourite expression of Hárslevelű (Tokaj’s second grape variety), zesty, witty, springtime-refreshing instead of the chunky, alcoholic, oxidative thing it so often becomes. Sarolta Bárdos and Péter Molnár of Tokaj Nobilis also make an excellent Hárs as well as a pure and limey 2008 Furmint from the cru of Barakonyi (and an intriguing semi-sweet Spätlese-styled Kövérszőlő, from Tokaj’s oldest, almost extinct variety). Judit Bott surpassed herself with a 2008 Csontos Furmint that has about the best mineral and structural balance I’ve seen in the region.
I tasted 60 Tokajs on that Friday and there was hardly a sweet botrytised aszú in sight. And yet it was as exciting as if I’d been in, say, Chablis or Rüdesheim. Revolutions always start quietly but eventually turn our world upside down. This one is no exception.

In Tokaj (1): Wounded heroes

For the visitor from outside, wintertime Hungary is depressive. The derelict villages are desert and the atmospheric depression coincides with very harsh economic times for Tokaj. A mixture of unwise business decisions from the late 1990s and Hungary’s suicidal governmental policy of the last few years has resulted in a complete standstill of sweet wine sales. Large companies are reporting hundreds of thousands €’s losses, and many small estates are struggling to survive.
 
It’s an irony that this decadence is coinciding with the production of the world’s very best sweet wines. I apologise to those Yquem or Kracher or Egon Müller lovers out there but they cannot really equal the sheer sensual bliss of a Királyudvar Lapis Aszú 2002 or István Szepsy 2003. This simple truth found more than a few confirmations during my short stay here in Tokaj.
Vineyards on the eastern slope of Tokaj Hill.
 
It is also becoming clear that after the royal duo of 1999 and 2000 and some extremely convincing 2002s, it’s 2003 and 2006 that are now delivering Tokaj’s best wines of the decade. (They will need to last a few years; there was almost no sweet wine made in 2009 to due adverse autumn weather). 2003, Europe’s hottest and driest vintage on record, gave birth to some mildly atypical but fantastically tense and driven botrytis wines that will live the life of a generation, or two. My tastings have been far from exhaustive but István Szepsy, Zoltán Demeter, Úri Borok’s Szt. Tamás, Royal Tokaji’s Mézes Mály, and even the lesser-known Erzsébet’s Aszúeszencia provided the most excitement; Demeter’s 260g-sugar, 10.5g-acids warhorse might well be the wine of the vintage. 
Tokaj, as mentioned, is in crisis. Thousands of bottles of botrytis aszú goingas back as 1998 remain unsold, and the obvious vineyard buying &planting overenthusiasm of the late 1990s has now become a serioushickup. I’ve seen one winery where dry whites from 2007 are still intank because there’s no cash to buy bottles. Those estates that debutedon more realistic business estimations later in the 2000s are faringbetter, basing their turnover on dry wines, but it’s still far from aneasy game: in a region where low yields and long ageing is aprerequisite of quality costs remain high, and Furmint is hardly anautomatic selling card on export markets.
Tokaj needs some cleaning.

But moments of crisis are a good time to make friends. Although Tokajers seem keen on keeping their prices where they’ve been (I’ve seen almost none of the unsold stock discounted), they’ll appreciate your purchase and especially your fidelity. Next time you’re after a solid mineral white with lots of terroir identity that goes brilliantly well with food, forget those Mâcons, Rheingaus and Savennières for once, and ask for Hungarian Furmint. You’ll be surprised – and might well be hooked for life.

Attila Homonna Furmint Határi 2006

Attila Homonna building his winery in June 2005.
I’m on my way to Tokaj to get updated on the latest vintage (and an overdose of residual sugar). In my habit of tuning up my palate to upcoming tasting I opened this bottle from microproducer Attila Homonna. He’s a mildly crazy fellow in his early 30s who started a 1-hectare estate out of the blue in 2002. The first wine he ever made, the Furmint Ordinarium 2002, was one of heck of a mind-blowing late-harvest Furmint that gave Zind-Humbrecht and Marcel Deiss a good run for their money. (I remember roaming around Vinexpo 2005 giving people a taste of the stuff and trying to spread the word, including to a politely uninterested Steven Spurrier). 

Homonna’s breakthrough came in 2005 when his high-perched, ungrafted 80-year-old vines in the vineyard of Határi produced arguably the best dry wine of the vintage in Tokaj. Now Homonna is known to the cognoscenti and can charge 25€ for a bottle.
This 2006 Határi is very impressive in that it comes from a very difficult vintage. Excessive summer heat produced unbalanced dry Furmints with high alcohol and burnt fruit. The high elevation of Határi was no remedy. But Homonna judiciously picked early and made a wine that is a gem of vibrancy and mineral structure. It needs airing though, being dominated upon opening by dusty-varnishy oak of not very high quality (a recurrent problem in Hungarian white wines, that I attribute to poorly seasoned oak). In fact it’s easy to dismiss the wine as unbalanced and drying on the palate. Decant in a tall carafe and chill for 5–6 hours and you’ll be astonished by the change: a core of appetizing tangerine fruit, Furmint’s iron-cast acidic structure, a pure crystalline minerality, length, length, depth, solidity. It’s not a perfect wine in terms of winemaking but the stellar quality of the terroir is strongly shining through. The wine easily surpassed a 2006 Furmint from regional star István Szepsy that I opened alongside.

Stay tuned for live reports from Tokaj over the next few days. 


Source of wine: own purchase. 

Happy New Year

Dear Readers, best wishes for the New Year!
 
I’m not very fond of self-referential blogging but want to say on this festive occasion how rewarding it has been to run this blog and receive comments and encouragement. As I’ve topped 10,000 visits to this modest diary in exactly one year of sharing my wine and tea drinking with you, it’s proved a great experience overall. 
No big New Year’s Eve celebrations chez Bońkowski this year: we’ve been babysitting and so Champagne has been limited to a few glasses of the Pierre Moncuit Grand Cru Blanc de Blancs Cuvée Pierre Moncuit-Delos – a crisp, driven, even slightly greenish Chardonnay that proved just a bit too young (though with over two years of disgorging), and a babysitter’s best friend – Moscato d’Asti. Paolo Saracco’s 2009 is a gorgeous glassful of fresh grapes, citrus and spring flowers, with balanced sweetness and great acidity, too. With 5% alcohol it was harmless to down the bottle between two, and that’s a great asset on New Year’s Eve if you ask me.
It’s my personal habit to open the best sweet wine I have (or one of the best) on New Year. Dessert wines lend themselves well to the relaxed late-morning pace I adopt on this day. This year, it was the Alois Kracher TBA No. 3 Scheurebe 1996. The late Alois Kracher was one of the greatest champions of botrytis wine in the world. Whatever the vintage, grape variety, and sweetness level he always managed to make a wine taste balanced and complete. This bottle is no different. It pours a deep amber and opens with an exhilarating liquid peach gelée nose, followed by lovely notes of toast, poppy seed and minerality. It’s really positively Tokaj-like both in the bouquet and the very good acidity that enlivens this 150+-grams-sugar wine. The palate is expansive and mildly mature, with that unmistakeable autumnal, fallen-leafy, honeyed character of great botrytis wine, and a finish that is growingly dry. It’s an auspicious wine for 2010. Happy New Year!
Disclaimer:
Source of wines: Moncuit Champagne – sample from the producer, Saracco Moscato, Kracher TBA – own purchases.
 

Le Pupille Saffredi 2006

Fattoria Le Pupille is one of the leading estates in the coastal Tuscan region of Maremma, and its flagship Bordeaux bottling Saffredi is arguably Maremma’s best wine outside of Bolgheri. Or so the international press seems to agree, showering it with praise in every vintage. Recent ones have been as successful as ever, with the 2004 ‘the best Saffredi ever made’ (this exact phrase comes up with 50% Google hits on this wine) and 2006 looking just as promising: it got RP96 and WS94, whatever it’s worth. 
 
Le Pupille also have a very efficient marketing team that made sure samples of the 2006 Saffredi reached all the right tasting tables (see e.g. Simon Woods). Yours truly was delighted to be on the list and assess this little fellow for your benefit.
 
Made of 25-year-old Cabernet Sauvignon, some Merlot and splashes of Syrah and the local Alicante (an offspring of Grenache), it has 14% alc. and sees 75% new oak. The oak must be very expensive and carefully selected here, for it makes its impact very clear from the beginning to the end. The dominant feeling is of richness, fatness, ripeness, abundance, luxury; the bouquet of this wine is that of a fat wallet and being able to buy whatever you like. There’s also quite some herby, bell-peppery, minty Cabernet–Merlot character on the nose, and a core of fleshy cherry fruit that has a Tuscan feel to it. So while a little disjointed and somewhat notional the nose at this stage the 2006 Saffredi can be said to mix terroir, grape variety and élevage in (more or less) happy proportions. 
 
Flavourwise, to say this wine is tight is to say little. The concentration is almost soupy and aromatically it is a little breathless from the oak and extract at the moment. Yet there are hints of that extra character that distinguishes a great wine from a merely very good one. The ripeness is controlled and there is not one moment of jamminess; the toasted oak flavour is quick to recede on the palate; the tannins are very present but never exactly overpowering, subtly but firmly controlled. And while it’s obviously way too early to open this big ‘potential’ wine, time in the glass and in the decanter is pretty quick to soften this into a fruitier, cherry-laden, only subtly oaky mouthful of ripe Mediterranean Cabernet. It’s all very, very good, like a brilliantly engineered sports car or an expensive watch; there is very little to criticise on the technical front.
 
Is there on the ‘emotional’ front? I’ve voiced my skepticism about the use of French grapes in Tuscany before, and while it’s obvious there are some world-class Cabernets and Merlots here, they never quite convey a sense of place and uniqueness as Sangiovese-based Tuscan reds can and should. Saffredi is „simply put, stunning juice” (quote from the Wine Advocate) but could equally well come from Lazio, Campania, Veneto or even Spain or Greece. After all, planting Cab and Merlot on a good soil and an exposed site, manicuring the vines and ageing in 1000-€ barrels is, when you have the guts and means, the easiest thing. I like to define such wines as ‘invented’. Saffredi is purely the fruit of its owner’s, Elisabetta Geppetti, two decades of determination. It shows top-notch quality of fruit and is really a supremely designed wine. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it’s not a very emotional wine for me, lacking what I look for in a Tuscan red, and coming across as a little soulless.

Giovanni Rosso Barolo Cerretta 2003

My tastes for wine are pretty eclectic, and I’d pretty much drink anything with interest unless it’s really overoaked and/or jammy. But when I think of one wine that I prefer over all others, it has to be Barolo. I have a weakness for those floral bouquets and high acidities, for that otherworldly elegance and unmistakeable sense of place of a good traditional Barolo. So when picking up a wine to drink in peace and solitude on Boxing Day I went for the Giovanni Rosso Barolo Cerretta 2003. A bottle I got as a gift, it comes from a lesser-known estate located in Serralunga, the eastern side of the Barolo zone, producing the appellation’s tightest and most ageworthy wines. Cerretta is one of the best vineyards there. 

Owner Davide Rosso is very traditional in his winemaking, which sees long macerations and ageing in large botte oak barrels only (though they are of French wood, not Slavonian as in the old days, coopered by the Italian company Garbellotto). Already pouring the wine into the glass, with its pale transparent crimson colour, it’s obvious this Barolo has nothing to do with the reformist movement that tried to ‘correct’ Nebbiolo’s inherent characteristics, looking for darker, less acidic, softer-tannic wines. And yet this Cerretta 2003 is no stubborn orthodox with punishing tannins. On the contrary, it’s the epitome of elegance. I felt an exhilarating wave of pure sensual pleasure when smelling this: lilies, roses and tulips, raspberries and strawberries, with a counterpoint of almost minty freshness that is so typical of Serralunga Barolos. Really lovely finesse and purity. On the palate it’s a very balanced wine, juicy, fresh, floral, only disclosing its 2003-driven richness and breadth towards the end where the tannins are very assertive but nicely ripe and never drying. And remember this comes from the the hottest and driest vintage on record which brought a wave of tough fruitless reds in many place in Europe. This wine is showing no vintage weakness whatsoever. And it drank beautifully over three days with fantastic composure. 
 
I’ve had many good bottles this year but this, somehow, was special. So extremely typical of why Barolo is special as a wine; proudly traditional yet immensely approachable and enjoyable to drink. And most importantly, with a crystal-clear sense of place that again brought a bit smile of happiness to my face.
Disclaimer
Source of wine: gift from the Polish importer

A gem from Georgia

Georgia in the Caucasus. ‘The cradle of wine’, as it styles itself without false modesty. While I think recent research gives priority to China, Georgia is indeed where the wine we drink today – European, Mediterranean wine – originated some 5,000 years ago. And surprisingly much of this heritage directly influences modern Georgian wines. Including Georgia’s greatest assets, its 500+ indigenous grape varieties. Some are the result of 2, 3, 4,000 years of genetic selection. Once the country modernises its wine industry and small family-owned domaines get to do some serious quality work in the vineyards, I’m sure you’ll hear about Saperavi, Rkatsiteli and Mtsvane.
Some of these grapes are widespread and grow on hundreds or thousands of hectares while other are very obscure and limited to single villages. Usakhelauri is one of them. While very famous in the past for its exquisitely flowery, velvety sweet wines, it is difficult to grow and has fallen out of favour. It’s hard to get trustworthy information but apparently it is now grown on around 1 ha of vines in the central Georgian region of Racha. Only two companies use it: Teliani Valley and Telavi Wine Cellar. The latter’s production is only 700 bottles a year. I was fortunate enough to receive a bottle of this expensive wine (retailing for around $40) upon my last visit to Georgia in 2005.

One of Georgia’s oddities is its wide range of ‘semi-sweet’ red wines. Produced by artificially stopping the fermentation when the wines reach c. 11% alc. and 50g residual sugar, they are surely an acquired taste, and are frequently frowned upon. I remember some vitriolic comments from Western critics after their trips to Georgia. Out of context, these wines cans surely seem odd (and many are pretty awful). In Georgia they are served in the afternoon over teatime nibbles that include dried and fresh fruits, nuts, fruit preserves, as well as tea and coffee. It’s difficult to find a wine that would pair well with such foods and drinks without being too alcoholic (as port and sherry are). Sweetish Georgian reds fill this gap. And when well-made from quality grapes, they can really be delicious.

This Telavi Wine Cellar Usakhelauri 2000 is a very good surprise. It’s only faintly sweet, balanced by really high acidity (I’d categorise this as semi-dry really). It tastes very young, with no evolution at all, and has a very good expression of crisp red cherry and damson fruit, with perhaps a bit of Usakhelauri’s notorious floral bouquet. Not too tannic but with plenty of vinosity: while many Georgian sweet reds can taste like a diluted home-made currant wine, this is the real thing. I’ve learned to appreciate its usefulness at the coffee table and a perfect match with festive conversation when we’ve had guests at 4pm yesterday. Port would have been too heavy, sweet Riesling too light, Tokaj too sharp, oaky Sauternes completely out of place. This Usakhelauri called for attention (for a moment) and kept the company spritely and good-humoured. The Georgians know how important that is: they spend a lot of time at family and friendly gatherings, talking a lot and drinking a lot. Thank God for the Georgians. 

Everything you’ll need to match with Usakhelauri.
Disclaimer
Source of wine: gift from the winery upon a visit in 2005. 

Wine’s best kept secrets

Oh yes, Greek wine. Nominally it’s one my specialities – I published my first article on Greek wine in the dark days of 2001 when few people cared – but unless you live in the UK or Germany, the availability of Greek wine is very limited. (Here in Poland, four producers!). And so it was on a private event that I met with a few fellow tasters to go through a range of wines for education and sensual delight.

On the white wine front, we’ve compared 2008s and 2007s from the four leading estates on the volcanic island of Santorini. There’s some (slowly) growing buzz about this vineyard location that surely belongs to the world’s most unusual and interesting. The partly submerged caldera of an extinct volcano, Santorini hosts some 1,000 hectares of vineyards on its lava rock soils. Unusual vineyards: the sweeping winds of the Aegean Sea mean that bush vines are pruned to grow in the shape of a basket, and often individually protected by low stone walls. Beautiful to photograph, back-breaking to work, yielding what are perhaps this planet’s most mineral wines.

Ktíma Gaía (ktíma is Greek for estate, so the name can be translated into Gaia Estate) harvest their grapes early and make a light- to medium-bodied, driven, seafoody, positively greenish style of Santorini: in lesser vintages like the Thalassítis 2008 the wine is quite simple but representative with good minerality and drinkability; Thalassítis 2007 adds a layer of saline complexity and a hint of evolutive toastiness (but showed a less than satisfactory evolution in the glass). (Thalassítis, interestingly, is an Ancient Greek term that denoted wines with seawater added as a conservative!). Ktíma Arghyroú is famous for its sweet vinsanto made of grapes dried on the sun (a local speciality) and aged for a decade in cask, but has been improving its dry wines too in recent years. The Santorini Assýrtiko 2008 is more or less in the style of the Gaia but more spontaneous and mineral, though the hot vintage’s limitations are obvious. The Santorini Ktíma Arghyroú 2007 (partly oaked) was the best 2007 tasted, a very exciting wine with plenty of mineral volcanic presence and some outstanding architecture in mouth; it’s a modern interpretation of Santorini that manages to tell much about the terroir as well. Santorini Varéli [=oak] 2003 is a big wine: I’m not so fond of the oaked Santorinis when they are young but with 5 or 6 years, minerality reemerges from underneath the oak and these can often be majestically powerful wines with honeyed-herby complexity and big structure. It’s the case here.

Haridímos Hatzidákis farms his vineyards biodynamically and has a penchant for late harvesting: his top cuvée Nichtéri (another traditional term: in Antiquity, nichteri wines were night-picked and crushed in fists for more elegance) often goes beyond 15%. I was looking forward to tasting the pre-phylloxera ‘Cuvée 17’ 2007 but it was corked (hinting at Hatzidákis’ broad, phenolic, alcoholic, less acid-driven style). We didn’t try the main estate label but the cheaper Aïdáni–Assýrtiko 2008 was one bold skin-contact white with plenty of power and mineral expression while retaining a nice natural balance and juiciness (it’s 12.5%: admirable self-restraint for this estate).

Many people’s (including mine) favourite estate on Santorini is that of French-trained Páris Sigálas. He manages to combine Hatzidákis uncompromised mineral expression with Gaía’s crisp juiciness, moderate alcohol, and no oak (in the main cuvée; there is also a Varéli). The 2007, in my recent tastings consistently one of the major Santorini successes of the decade, was underwhelming in this showing with some nice minerality but also hot alcohol (yet it’s only 13%), toastiness, and a stale sunflower oil edge too; clearly this wasn’t a perfect bottle. And the Santorini Varéli 2008 was as oaky, creamy, honeyed, unmineral, sweet-fruity as these young oaked Santorinis get. Revisit in 2015. But Sigálas stole the show anyway with a stunning Santorini 1998, a very evolved wine with an almost vin jaune-like (others said madeira) oxidation but so much stoney mineral austerity on the palate it told you more about geology than a term at university. An unusual, challenging but eminently enriching wine that shows where Santorini belongs in the wine world: at the absolute top.

We’ve also tried two wines from western Crete from the Manousákis estate: the red Nóstos 2005 (a Rhône blend) was tasting un-Greek and lifeless with rich low-acid fruit but little poise and slightly too much oak, but the Roussanne 2008 while oaky also has excellent acidity and minerality, impressive substance and length. Give it five years and it should prove a big bottle.

On the red wine front, I contributed a bottle of Papantónis Meden Agan 2001, a 100% Aghiorghítiko grape from the Neméa appellation on the Peloponnese, one of my favourite Greek wines. Skillfully vinified in the modern French style by owner Antónis Papantónis, it is a Mediterranean red with real sense of balance and elegance, slowly evolving but retaining a freshness that both makes it a jewel at the dining table and promises another 8–10 years of development. Meden Agan is produced in reasonable quantities and ridiculously affordable at 10€. 

10€ is also the price of Ktíma Kir-YiánniNáoussa Rámnista, the ‘Barolo of Greece’ as I like to nickname it. Thegeographical and stylistic opposite of Meden Agan, it originates fromthe high hills of western Greek Macedonia, and more specifically theAOC Náoussa where the king is Xynómavro: a pale-coloured, high-acid,high-tannin grape capable of otherworldly finesse. Rámnista (asingle-vineyard oak-aged Náoussa) ages as well as a Barolo, too: the1998 was a little murky on the nose at first but then opening towardsspring flowers and redcurrants; a fully resolved palate gaining floweryelegance with airing; still tannic to continue for a few years. The1995 is now almost à point showing an outstanding quality to the deftlypolished, mineral, crystal-clear tannins, and a miraculous petitsfruits rouges elegance on the nose. If someone has negative stereotypesagainst Greek wines I guess they’d be stunned to taste this anddiscover what it is.

The wine of the night award goes to the Rámnista 2001, however. Combining the characteristics of the 1998 and 1995 above, it adds some impressive power and chocolatey richness on the palate, and is at its best with half an hour in the glass. Supreme elegance, iron-cast structure, regal fruit and big ageing potential: Rámnista is positively Europe’s greatest red-wine bargain.

Ktíma Kir-YiánniNáoussa Rámnista 1995 in the glass.

In Apulia (2): Black and bitter

This gate in the old part of Lecce is a good metaphor of Negroamaro’s current condition.

Besides Primitivo (on which I’ve blogged here), Apulia’s other major grape variety is Negroamaro. It’s by far my preferred of these two. In many aspects, Negroamaro is the exact opposite of Primitivo. It ripens notoriously late, producing wines that are high in acidity and with nervy tannins but not very deeply coloured, with less sensual fruit than Primitivo. While Negroamaro can be harnessed to make some attractive unoaked, early-drinking, fruit-focused modern wines, its major interest in the past have been its ageworthy versions released after years of cask ageing, not in their primary youth but in the glory of their balsamic tertiary evolution. Aged Salice Salentino, the best appellation for this style of wine, as well as Brindisi, Copertino and several other DOCs have been, for me, some of the best wines of Italy’s Meridione.

I approached this trip to Apulia with excitement, therefore, but came back rather disappointed and worried. Old style Negroamaro is an endangered species. The ruthless modernisation of vineyards and cellar practice has swiftly relegated the traditional style to the antic. And there is a wave of Parkerized (or rather ‘Gambero-Rossoed’) Negroamaro that are really some of the most disgusting wines I’ve had of late.

The problem is that Negroamaro doesn’t really lend itself to modern vinification: it doesn’t like new oak, loses its vital freshness quickly when picked late in search of the elusive ‘physiological ripeness’, while its fierce tannins that formerly melted with years of large oak cask ageing, easily become exasperatedly drying when submitted to the Cotarella-style heavy-handed extraction. (Riccardo Cotarella is Italy’s most influential ‘flying winemaker’, and while long absent from Apulia he’s now consulting for some major wineries).  

The Darth Vader of Apulia.


An eloquent example of Negroamaro’s collapse in the hand of the modern style was Leone de CastrisEloveni, supposedly an everyday easy-drinking example of the grape (which it was in the past), now overconcentrated and overextracted through some cellar tricks it’s better to ignore, and made to taste like a soupy ‘forest berries’-infused red that could with equal plausibility be a Colchagua Merlot or a Bulgarian Syrah. To cater for the alleged ‘consumer taste’ it even comes with a generous dollop of residual sugar, for which Mr. Cotarella has even coined a deliciously cynical euphemism of svinatura dolce (‘racking off while still sweet’: this clumsy translation does nothing to communicate the oxymoronic panache of the original). We’ve also had a series of revolting Negroamaros from youngly established wineries such as Antica Masseria del Sigillo, L’Astore, Menhir or Santa Maria del Morige.


New blood lacking, it were the old classics to solitarily defend Negroamaro’s honour. I was lucky enough to attend two mini-verticals of Apulia’s standard-bearers. Duca d’Aragona from the large winery of Candido is a blend of Negroamaro with 20% Montepulciano, aged in small oak. It’s a powerful red that needs plenty of bottle age to mellow, as shown by the tight, iron-cast, minty, aromatically still somewhat vague 2003, which I however trust will join the good vintages of this bottling: the purity of fruit and overall balance are quite fine (though my Apulian hosts dismissed it as ‘too international’; it’s now made by Lombardian consultant Donato Lanati). The 2000 is still too young, though slowly revealing the cherry core of real Negroamaro and its acidic drive, and taking on chocolatey, meaty notes of maturity; it’s another wine where the extract (not speaking of oak) is perfectly gauged, and impressively backward for 9 years of age. The 1998 (still made by Severino Garofano, the dean of Apulian winemakers) is brilliant, with a lovely complex nose full of green notes of mint and camphora, less solar, more mineral than the 2000 or 1997, with wonderfully preserved primary fruit and still some power to go. My preferred vintage was 1997 (my host Franco Ziliani preferred the 1998) that was lighter than the 1998 but had a supreme effortless elegance: fresh, poised, pure, tonic, delicate, still with a kiss of tannins, it was a majestic bottle.

Gratticciaia from Agricole Vallone was introduced in 1996 as an innovation: instead of softening Negroamaro’s rough edges with the soft fruity Malvasia Nera grape and long cask ageing, the grapes are given a few weeks of amarone-like drying on reed matts. The result is an individual, expressive wine with the pruney dried-fruity notes of an amarone but also the Mediterranean herby twist of Apulia. The 2004 (first vintage by new consultant Graziana Grassini) is just a little underwhelming at the moment, showing good depth and harmony on nose but rather simple and short on palate. The 2000 (which I’ve tried in Warsaw not Apulia) is tight, powerful, expressive and impressive but would best be kept for another 5–6 years. The 1998 is a great wine, with a lovely nose less driven by appassimento, flowery, mildly green too (a recurrent characteristic in this vintage), greatly long on palate, quiet, elegant, opening up nicely in the glass over 40 minutes or so, with fantastic firmness and poise on the finish. It can still go on.


I have a weakness for the third of these Negroamaro musketeers: Patriglione from the Cosimo Taurino estate. Made from a lateish harvest but no drying of grapes, Patriglione comes from very old Negroamaro vines and sees some small oak which it digests very well. Here, too, a new winemaker has recently joined: Massimo Tripaldi, and his first vintage, the 2003, is very convincing with richness, power and structure to age well. I’ve recently also had the opportunity to taste the 2001 – more elegant than the 2003, with a textural finesse I found enticing; the slightly less convincing 2000; the 1994 that was a little tired (and had big cork problems with 2 out of 3 bottles tasted) but still showed the Patriglione character; the 1975 – actually the first vintage ever made: read here; and the 1997 which was a unforgettable bottle full of regal fruit, power and elegance at the same time. Patriglione is really a wine to die for, and at only 35€ it’s also quite affordable.

In Apulia (1): Neoprimitivism

I’m in Apulia, the Italian boot’s heel, to have a look at the current wine scene and the recent developments. The tour is organised by Radici Wines, an innovative mini-competition devoted exclusively to indigenous varieties, and my gracious cicerones are renowned wine writer Franco Ziliani and Enzo Scivetti of the Apulian branch of ONAV.

Fellow tasters Kyle Phillips, Rosemary George and Patricia Guy enjoying Pichierri’s Primitivos.

This lowland region is one of Italy’s largest producers of wine, although you’ll be excused for not being familiar with its produce as much of it is sold in bulk and much is of unexciting quality. In fact, Apulia conveys a sense of hopelessness as it has so far failed to create any romance associated with its wines. Sicily generally is jazzy and its Nero d’Avola wines just feel fashionable while Apulia, although its production structure is similar (co-ops, large latifunds, bulk production), is really stuck with its provincial image.


Well, there’s one wine that has managed to emerge from the Apulian magma of no less than 26 obscure wine appellations and as many grape varieties: Primitivo. This grape has been vehicled to fame by its discovered genetic link with Zinfandel and it’s been steadily gaining market share since. 

Manduria’s period of prosperity was the 19th century.

Primitivo yields a controversial wine with massive colour, hyperintense fruit and limitless alcohol. While in the past high yields and conservative harvest times kept the wines within reasonable limits, the modern tendency towards higher concentration has generated wines that are absolutely outrageous. On this tour we’ve visited two Primitivo strongholds, Manduria on the Ionian coast next to Taranto, and the more obscure Gioia del Colle in central Apulia, and on both comparative tastings there were many wines above 15%. One of dry wines was 18.2% while several scored 16% with over 10g of residual sugar. More frighteningly still, Apulia still abides by the old Italian tradition of indicating total potential alcohol on the label (fractioned into svolto – the actual fermented alcohol – and non svolto which effectively is residual sugar). A Primitivo Dolce Naturale from producer Attanasio thus boasts 19.5% on the front label, while the off-dry and semi-sweet wines from veteran Pichierri are 19, 20 and even 21%.

And this even isn’t Polvanera’s strongest wine.


For those port drinkers among you this might not sound all that outrageous but remember that half of a port’s 20% alc. is added in the form of grape spirit. Indeed the sweet Primitivos share many characteristics with port (and at the same time, amarone, being more often than not produced from slightly dried grapes) but have much better balanced alcohol. Semi-sweet red is a marginal style anyway. But the big problem comes with those 16 and 17% dry reds. If you agree that a wine’s primary characteristic is drinkability, Primitivo is born with a serious handicap.



It’s not the grape’s only problem. Naturally low acids and an obvious simplicity of bouquet are another. Combined with the modern tendency towards interventionist viticulture to increase concentration, late picking, heavy extraction, short ageing to boost primary fruit, and new French oak, all this results in Primitivos that are one-dimensional and really rather tiresome to drink. Sure, they have some of the most sensually compelling fruit profiles to be found anywhere, and when skillfully made can provide spectacular wines. Out of the 120-odd we’ve tried I’ve enjoyed those of Fatalone, Plantamura, scJ’o and recent star Polvanera (all from Gioia del Colle) as well as the very amaronish Attanasio, the superconcentrated Mille Una, the meatier, more rustic range of Accademia dei Racemi and the polished Duca Guarini. But a good half of those Primitivos were just too heavy, tiresome and barely drinkable.

Vittorio Pichierri drawing 22-year-old Primitivo from clay amphora.


Although it can be argued that Primitivo as a grape can digest the modern style better than many (surely better than Apulia’s other main grape, Negroamaro), there’s something unique to traditionally-made old-style Primitivo that is sorely missing in the modern examples. A visit to the cellars of Pichierri in the town of Sava (formerly the heart of Primitivo cultivation) was an eye-opening revelation. Produced largely from bought-in grapes from free-growing old vines (alberello), slowly fermented in concrete tanks, largely unoaked, bottled several years after the harvest, and sold ridiculously cheap, Pichierri wines are unlike anything else I’ve tasted. Here, Primitivo reveals an unexpected depth of aroma, a compelling bitter chocolate texture that has nothing to do with the jammy flabbiness of the modern style, and the alcohol – although often even higher than its peers’ – is miraculously well balanced. Everything here is honest, wholesome and dangerously drinkable, from the basic 1.10€-a-liter bulk wine sold to locals in plastic containers (this is an important part of the business in Apulia, and most wineries we visited still sell a sizeable part of their production this way) to the trio of vini dolci naturali, unfortified semi-sweet Primitivos of wonderfully balsamic fruit and staggering expression.


The fun at Pichierri continued with the desealing of a traditional clay amphora called capasone, containing a 22-year-old Primitivo that was fresh as a daisy and deliciously juicy (if a little unclean and bretty), and then the 1975 Primitivo di Sava, one of the great wines of my life. 18% alcohol and a fair bit of sugar, black as ink after 34 of ageing (22 of which in tank), with a fabulously complex bouquet of grand cru chocolate, balsamic vinegar, dried fruits and Christmas spices, and a palate of such vibrancy and unadulterated, fleshy fruit that was beyond the reach of many vintage ports at age 10 and modern Primitivos at age 2.


Pichierri sell quite a bit on export markets and although largely ignored by the press and critics, they seem to be in good commercial shape. I truly hope they can continue to make Primitivo as they have for 30 years. When they stop, it’s one of Italy’s best kept classic secrets that dies out. 

See another report on this visit by Franco Ziliani