Riesling Archives - Page 3 of 4 - Wojciech BońkowskiWojciech Bońkowski

The good, the bad and the sulphury

I have been drinking through a series of ambitious Rieslings recently, and it’s interesting what a mixed bunch they’ve been. Riesling is the wine lover’s puppy, having a unique ability to convey a sense of place and a natural tension between fruit, minerality, acidity and sugar. But it’s also a fairly demanding and capricious grape: the margin of error is smaller than when making Chardonnay or Syrah. Leave a bit too much sugar and your acidity will not balance the whole; pick the grapes a bit late for dry wine and alcohol will soar: while 13.5% in a Sauvignon Blanc is no big deal, it often spoils a good Riesling. Riesling is also one of the grapes, in my experience, with the highest incidence of corked bottles (the proportion of TCA taint is the same with other wines but it’s a lot easier to perceive in a filigree Riesling). And it’s extremely sensitive to tasting conditions.

I was reminded of this adage when I opened two bottles of Heymann-Löwenstein’s within a few days. The Schieferterrassen Riesling 2004 is Löwenstein’s entry-level bottling but proved extremely satisfying, with wonderful minerality, crystalline fruit and a great sense of balance. The Röttgen Erste Lage Riesling 2005 is a prestigious grand cru bottling that should show superior to the Schieferterrassen but didn’t. Sure, there was the same mineral signature of Löwenstein’s (ripe minerality reminiscent of warm sea: imagine a juxtaposition of Chablis and Santorini) but the wine seemed flat and overly sugary, with little fruit expression. It was purely a matter of momentary perception: on a cloudy, rainy day that was a ‘root day’ in the biodynamic calendar (the worst type of day to taste wines; look for flower days and fruit days for the best results) the wine just tasted opaque and fruitless.

The Egon Müller / Le Gallais Wiltinger Braune Kupp Riesling Spätlese 2002 and Joh. Jos. Prüm Graacher Himmelreich Riesling Auslese 1996 tasted alongside shared the same fate. They’ve now eaten their sulphur (of which the Prüm surely contained heroic amounts) and are showing some nice minerality but were neither very rich or expressive and for such prestigious bottlings, simple and underwhelming.

A few days later on a ‘flower day’, a bottle with far more modest pedigree just shone. The Winninger Uhlen Riesling Spätlese trocken 2006 from Reinhard & Beate Knebel in the lower Moselle was all a dry slate-grown Riesling should be: powerfully expressive, substantial, mineral and tense. It’s a fairly boisterous style with some botrytis grapes used for this wine, a deep orange colour, plenty of spice on nose and a broad, rich palate. Much an Auslese trocken in style, it’s a little unbalanced and perhaps controversial on less luckily bio-influenced day, but today it just tasted right.

Deep-coloured Riesling.

Georg Breuer’s 2008s

It is a tradition of my Erste Lage Sneak Preview visits to finish the second day of the tasting with a visit to the Georg Breuer estate in Rüdesheim. Breuer is not a member of the VDP association and so cannot participate in the Erste Lage tasting, but quality-wise he belongs to the very top flight of German wineries, so it is de rigueur to come here and have a look at the latest vintages. From Wiesbaden it’s only a 30-minute hop by train (with all the classified vineyards to be admired from the train’s window on the way).

Sunrise over Rüdesheim (photo quality courtesy of Sony Ericsson).

I’ve recently sung the praise of Breuer’s 2007s (see here and here), and it was obvious that this new vintage (see here for a full overview) would have a hard time living up to that level. But the 2008s here turned out very enjoyable. In fact, they were stunningly good if you consider the average level of the vintage in the Rheingau. There was none of the green unripe acidity, and even the simplest dry Riesling here – the 9€ 2008 Sauvage – was not far away qualitatively from the Grosse Gewächse we tried a couple of hours earlier in Wiesbaden.

Mind you, these Rieslings are acidic. The 2008 Rüdesheim Estate (a village-level wine from various crus) has no less than 9.6g of acidity (and 6.9g of residual sugar) and yet it’s a wine of ripe mineral aromas and of engaging purity on the palate. Theresa Breuer says they were concerned by the very high analytical figures and even tried some deacidification but the damage to the wine’s balance was huge. This bottling, like its slightly more powerful sibling of the 2008 Terra Montosa (made from declassified lots of Breuer’s grands crus) shows a warm sea salinity that reminded me of Chablis.

Berg Rottland and Berg Schlossberg are to your left.

Looking at the top bottlings here, the 2008 Berg Rottland Riesling was, as usually, the most open and approachable with lovely balance, bone dry, finely crafted, precise, mineral and really impressive for the vintage; a wine I find quite enjoyable today, with no challenging acidity. The 2008 Berg Schlossberg Riesling comes from a more exposed, more consistently dark-slatey vineyard and is, as usually, a very backward wine, with a bit more power and punch than the Rottland; in some vintages it can lack the acidic vivacity of the latter but in 2008, that extra ripeness from the sun-absorbing dark slate soil was definitely an advantage. Develops really well in the glass (becoming almost flowery); this will be drinkable sooner than Schlossberg usually is. The 2008 Nonnenberg Riesling is a cru I drink more rarely than the two above; from the village of Rauenthal farther east, the soil here is less slatey, more loamy. This is also a rather shy wine but less tight texturally than the Schlossberg, leaner, though not less mineral. All three are very pure wines with impressively ripe acidity; they really seem to come from a different vintage than the very lemony Rieslings from the Rheingau tasted at the Erste Lage Preview. Of course, tasting at a producer’s cellar with more time to dedicate to each wine does change your perception by a margin. But not such a wide margin. So why this difference? Theresa Breuer indicates record-low yields (going down to 25 hl/ha in the Schlossberg, and that’s at a density of 8000 vines/ha…) as responsible for the riper acidity.

We finished the evening at Breuer’s crowded Schloss Rüdesheim Weinstube, starting with a wine taster’s best friend – cold beer, and rounding off the session with a bottle of Breuer’s enjoyable Riesling Brut. Come here really hungry as the portions are huge, and be prepared for Japanese parties and a lot of singing…

Erste Lage Sneak Preview 2009 (full report)

My extensive report from the largest tasting of top German Rieslings. All regions comprehensively reviewed.

Erste Lage Sneak Preview 2009

Greetings from Wiesbaden where I’m tasting through 250 Erste Lage wines before they are released on the market on September 1st. Organised by VDP association of estates, this yearly event is one of the best in a taster’s calendar. First, because it’s so well organised, and despite there being around 100 tasters the team of sommeliers who are pouring the wines is incredibly efficient. Second, because all the wines are good. It’s no exaggeration: these are all grand cru level wines that are the result of a stringent selection, meaning that the qualitative threshold is really quite high (translating into a numerical scale all these wines would generally score 85/100 or higher). Together with the fact that they’re predominantly white Rieslings with ripe acidity and no oak, it allows to taste a record-high amount of wines without really getting tired. (Last year, I did 160 in one day, with pretty consistent notes).

The modest edifice of the Kurhaus in Wiesbaden that hosts this annual event.

Other than to pick up a few bottles I will myself attempt to buy (this stuff sells out quickly) this tasting is really useful to examine the style of the latest vintage – in our case, 2008 for the white wines – in detail.

In short, 2008 in Germany is really rather average. It’s got mixed reviews – some producers saying it was dismal, others that it was good+ – but while it’s certainly no disaster, it’s the least interesting year since at least 2000. The weather conditions posed no great threat to the grapes but ripening was delayed, so that few vineyards ever reached a satisfactory phenolic ripeness to make great dry wines. In the long harvest period that stretched from late September through mid-November, the exact picking time was crucial. Too early and there was a streak of unpleasantly green, bitterish acidity in your wines (a frequent problem); too late and alcohol soared to 13.5% or more while phenolically the grapes were still not totally ripe, making for unbalanced wines that have no sufficient concentration or texture to support the alcohol.

Tasters at work.

Here are some bullet points about the vintage:

1. Low concentration: the wines are not exactly diluted but they lack the natural density of 2007 or 2006.

2. Green acidity: As mentioned, it’s what effectively differentiates the vintage from other cool ones such as 2004. Many wines have a vegetal, stemmy, tannic, bitterish impression on the finish. This might integrate with ageing, although it will never go away. In many wines it’s a major sensory problem.

3. Noticeable alcohol: Although the objective figures are lower than in 2007 or 2006 (most wine are at 13–13.5%, some have 12.5%, one single wine shows 14% on the label), the lack of natural concentration and fruit intensity makes these moderate amounts noticeable, and many wines display alcoholic heat on the finish.

4. Disappointing progression: Some Rieslings actually have a nice attack on the palate, filled with smacky fruit but quickly weaken from mid-palate on, leading to a diluted, fruitless, acid-driven finish that is very much an anti-climax. Winemakers will know it’s not so difficult to add interest to a wine’s bouquet or initial impact but the persistence is impossible to counterfeit.

5. Low fruit: I’m not so hostile to acidity (when it’s ripe), and can even take a bit of greenness when the wine has substance and expression of fruit. Few German 2008s have that, though. The incomplete phenolic ripeness of the grapes affected the fruit aromas and flavours, and often they haven’t at all developed. Too many wines can be described as ‘naked’, ‘hollow’, fruitless etc.

6. Terroir presence: This is the trickiest point. Minerality in itself is elusive. While high levels of acids together with some SO2 reduction can give an impression of minerality, this will never make up for lack of real terroir presence that can only be generated by ripe grapes and good concentration. While many secondary cru wines are showing what I call ‘nominal minerality’, only the greatest German terroirs – Scharzhofberger in the Saar, Pechstein in the Pfalz – are really expressing their full potential.

Erste Lage and Grosses Gewächs is a system that for the few years of its existence, has worked fairly well. It has simplified German wine, and put the best terroirs and best wines in the limelight. But it’s in hard times that you recognised the quality of an institution like this. In a substandard vintage like 2008, it was the good sense of the VDP association and the single growers to reduce the number and amoung of Erste Lage wines made, and release many wines in a lower category like Spätlese trocken or just Riesling trocken with a vineyard name. That hasn’t been done, and although I’ve heard a number of explanations from German producers and writers that ranged from viticultural to political, it will really be hard to justify the expense of 25–35€ (which is the price range for most Grosses Gewächs wines) on 80% of these bottles.

This article continues tomorrow with a full assessment of the different regions and the best recommended wines.

My workstation.

Anniversary wines

Sky is the limit

We’ve had an important anniversary in the family, and it was time to bring some really big guns from the cellar. I’ve poured some of the oldest wines in my collection. You don’t drink a bottle from 1938 every weekend.

It was the sort of event that takes weeks if not months of planning. Browsing internet wine shops, enquiring for offers, searching for tasting notes. Pondering a dinner menu, thinking of food & wine matches. Planning a proper ‘trajectory’ for the event. Alternative scenarios, ‘B’ plans (old bottles are often faulty). In the end I’m happy with how smoothly it went. With some helping hands in the kitchen I managed to serve 12 courses with matching wines to a party of 10, steering clear of major disasters. And it all took short of 9 hours.

I’ll spare you a description of the food – reading about bisques, soufflés and chocolates on a blog always sounds a little over-indulgent and of little usefulness – and share a few tasting notes.

Domaine Vacheron Sancerre 2006
This wasn’t served to guests – it was the cook’s aperitif. It’s quite ripe for a Loire Sauvignon, with subdued acidity but an obvious mineral character. A classy wine, though not a monster of expression. But I prefer Vacheron’s clean style in a less ripe vintage.

Pol Roger Cuvée Sir Winston Churchill 1993
A gift from the maison that I’ve cellared since 2003. 1993 was a structured vintage, but never great and now largely overshadowed by the likes of 1996. Yet top cuvées from 1993 are now in top shape – this Churchill surely is. Outstanding from the first to the last drop (not that it lasted long). Fresh, unevolved, poised and mineral. There is some underlying sweetness of dosage but also good vinosity and juiciness. The flavour is very fused, and it’s difficult to give a detailed analysis: perhaps a bit of raspberry atop the more usual notes of brioche and vanilla. Still very young – this can go on for another decade or two. Brilliant wine.
We’ve also had some other champagnes including a crisp, engaging Brut Réserve Rosée (two years since dégorgement) from Philipponnat, whom I find very much on the upswing of late.

Perrier-Jouët Blason de France 1959
I got this bottle from the Barolo–Brunello shop in Germany. The level was a little low and there was some heavy sediment so I knew the risk (and the very amiable owner Stefan Töpler made it clear). Such old bottles are always a hazard. Here, the cork was completely loose and the wine awfully oxidised with no bubbles. Oh well.

Domdechant Hochheimer Domdechaney
Riesling Spätlese 1983
I visited this estate on the Main near Frankfurt in April 2005, and we’ve had a great conversation with owner Dr. Franz Werner Michel. At lunch, this 1983 was served, and enhanced by Michel’s engaging stories, it tasted as good as any mature Riesling ever did. Upon saying our goodbyes we were offered a bottle each of the same wine. As usually with precious wines, it was waiting in my cellar for an ‘occasion’. A very mature wine, with some storage problems perhaps (cork was completely soaked) showing in a musty, unclean nose, though underneath there is some good Firne [aged Riesling] character. Sweeter than expected on the palate, but there is also a greenness to the sweetness and acidity. This bottle showed a bit unremarkable but was surely short of perfectly stored.

Jean-Marc Brocard
Chablis Grand Cru Bougros 1998
As expected from the youngest wine of the afternoon, no problems whatsoever with this bottle. It was part of a mixed case of older vintages I bought at the estate last October. It’s only 35€ – a bargain for a grand cru of any age, let alone a decade old. When tasted in Chablis, it showed very good saline minerality but also quite some oak sweetness. Yet served with food (a saffron-flavoured poule à la crème), the oak disappeared almost completely. It was a lesson in real-life food & wine matching. Crisp, linear, mineral, statuesque almost, showing power and reserve. An excellent wine. Dregs retasted the day after were less exciting, less poised, built around the butter and vanilla I remembered from October. Not bad at all on a hedonistic level though.

Domaine Huët
Vouvray Le Haut-Lieu demi-sec 1961
I got this bottle a couple of years ago from the excellent Bacchus Vinothek in Germany. The price seemed low (50€), and these Vouvrays are known for their ageing potential so I took the plunge. Looking at the intact label and the immaculate cork it’s clear this bottle was at best recorked (and likely refilled?), and at worst it’s not a 1961 at all. It’s an excellent aged Vouvray but it really tastes too young and dynamic to be 48 years old. The colour is also a bit suspect, with green tinges (unlikely in a wine of this age?) to a medium golden whole:

Aromatically it’s dominated by a taut, austere reductive character: not quite stinky but very herby and hayey, with a bit of richness that reminded me of an old Tokaj. On the palate it is very structured with mouth-puckering acidity effectively covering the sweetness, although the demi-sec character is quite pronounced for a wine of this alleged age. There’s also some alcohol (only 12% on the label). A big, structured wine that’s fairly immobile and could easily survive another decade. If you don’t need it to be a genuine 1961 it’s a very fine bottle for the money.

Thierry Allemand Cornas Chaillot 1996
A bin-end from Vienna’s Unger & Klein, sold at 32€ instead of the more usual 60€. Deepish colour especially at core, for the age. It starts fairly barnyardy and reduced on the nose but fortunately isn’t bretty, and with some proper airing this blows off, revealing a fairly engaging nose of crushed raspberries and good vinous depth. Some mild age on the palate but this is far from old. Palate on entry is also pleasant: vaguely varietal and peppery, but the progression is highly disappointing. Basically this just weakens and disappears on the palate. No structure whatsoever: modest acidity (though enough for freshness) and no tannins. There’s a beguiling purity about the whole thing and I can’t say it’s uninteresting but I wouldn’t pay the normal price for it. Perhaps the vintage’s lowly reputation in the northern Rhône is justified after all.

Cosimo Taurino Brindisi Riserva Patriglione 1975
This was another bin-end from a German shop, so obscure they didn’t even know how to price it. Eventually I got away with 35€. In its recent vintages it’s a southern Italian classic I very much enjoy, essentially a modified Salice Salentino (based on the Negroamaro grape) made with an amarone-like technique of drying the grapes to raisins. Fill level is quite and the cork is excellent (certainly recorked) but storage is an issue, as the wine is showing very aged. There’s a leathery, cooked-fruity, vinegary, almost maderised character that some of my diners disliked, though with a bit more experience in Apulian wines I find it fairly typical. This has aged on acidity (and some greenness) but lacks superior dimension or definition. On the other hand a Brindisi red at age 33 in this shape is surely not a bad achievement.

Giacomo Borgogno & Figli Barolo Riserva 1947
It’s another Barolo–Brunello bottle from Stefan Töpler. I paid 149€ for it and whenever I can justify the expense again, I’ll be sure to order some more – an outstanding bottle of wine.
I have had numerous older Barolos from the house of Borgogno, including a fantastically refined 1958, an impressive, brooding 1961 and a gentler 1967. But all came from the producer’s cellar, and were all opened and checked for faults, then refilled with the same wine, recorked and relabelled. Basically you get a Borgogno guarantee that the wine is in good shape. This makes the producer’s prices (the 1961 was 105€ a year ago) even more of a ridiculous bargain.

This bottle was different in that it came from a private cellar and was not refurbished. I can’t tell you much about the cork as at my first attempt to pull it out (with a 2-blade opener instead of a corkscrew) it smoothly dived inside the bottle. But the wine was in fine condition and I must congratulate Mr. Töpler for his sourcing. It’s rare to find wines in such pristine shape even from the 1960s. A moderate amount (i.e., little for the age) of fine-ish sediment. The colour is not bad, surely quite evolved but actually a fairly poetic complex hue ranging from clean ruby at core to amaranth-orange:

The one disappointing thing here is the nose. I usually enjoy Barolo as much for its fantastically floral, deep bouquet as for anything else, but here it’s a little lifeless, showing modest notes of raspberries, dominated by a green, briney, animal, damp-cellary, mildly over-the-hill character. But palate is very fresh and alive, with beguiling coffeed complexity. Very good length too. Perhaps not the ultimate Barolo experience (1961, with its remaining power, is more impressive) but very interesting for sure. Last sips at room temperature are really tannic (!), mineral, impressively long and so very much alive.

Kopke Porto Colheita 1938
A half-bottle that was distributed to journos who attended a presentation of old colheita ports from the Sogevinus companies (a holding that was established in 2006 and regroups some of the most prestigious port brands: Barros, Burmester, Cálem and Kopke). No bottling date but likely to have been 2007, shortly before the event. Colour is a transparent brown-amber. For volatility and a salty, marmitey character this is close to a madeira in style. A vestige of pink fruit, crystallised sugar, minor saltiness underneath; not really nutty (unlike most of these old colheitas). Moderate sweetness, high acidity, good (but not extraordinary) length, this is a good example of an aged colheita but frankly unexceptional. The flavour is a bit low and there’s only reasonable complexity; this tastes like a mid-1970s colheita could (and not a greatly structured one at that). Perhaps just an inferior vintage here, as the 1937 was one of the stars of the said tasting.

Hans Lang Hattenheimer Hassel Riesling Spätlese 2003

The power of stereotype

I’ve already blogged on the 2003 vintage for European white wines (here and here). Expected to have a 2003-free cellar by now, but there’s always the lone bottle lurking here and there where I least expect it. I discovered a half-dozen on the German Spätlese shelf. For German sweet wines, it was actually a fairly good vintage, beating records of ripeness throughout the country as grapes dried on the vine during that torrid summer without the usual help of botrytis.

This Hattenheimer Hassel Riesling Spätlese 2003 from the overperforming estate of Hans Lang is a case in point. The colour is fairly young (what vinous practice likes to describe as ‘plate gold’), and there’s really not a hint of evolution save for a minor note of brown sugar caramel. The nose is explosive, spicy, very Rieslingey, and really engaging. The palate offers the same register with an extra splash of lemony pithiness; it’s really mouth-watering. There is not a lot of concentration, in fact a bit of the wateriness I consider a hallmark of classic German Riesling. This is arguable, but I prefer a Spätlese to taste of Spätlese and not downgraded Auslese (as seems to be the ubiquitous fashion throughout Germany). This lemony acidity has preserved the wine, and remaining bottles (I have none) could easily live to see their 15th anniversaries.

This was a fine performance by a wine style you’d expect to age well even in 2003. But I recently opened Lang’s 2003 Hattenheimer Wisselbrunnen Riesling Erste Lage. This grand cru level wine only has 10.5g of residual sugar (and 13.5% alc.). In ripe and overripe vintages these late-harvested dry Rieslings are usually the first to surrender to alcohol and fatness. Not here. An admirably poised and zesty 2003 with little alcohol and, again, almost no evolution. Primary fruit is a bit down, leaving a healthy amount of punchy minerality. Tastes dry and actually quite fresh. Not an immensely complex or deep wine but could continue ageing in search of these characteristics.

I was really surprised by the excellent showing of these two wines and enquired the owner Mrs. Gabriele Lang about the vintage. She says that in the central Rheingau around Hattenheim, loess soils dominate (as opposed to the more usual slate). The very rainy 2002/2003 winter helped build considerable water reserved, which the loess soils then released on the stressed vines during that tropical summer. Mrs. Lang considers 2003 one of the top vintages for this part of the region. This explains why these two bottles were so delicious, and shows the limitation of ‘vintage overviews’ that are the wine press’ workhorse.

Love and hate in Alsace

Is Alsace the best wine region in the world, as the Alsatians claim?

62 grands crus (3 on video)

Well, almost. Let’s say 62 grand cru level wines that were poured during a morning and afternoon session at Robert Mielżyński’s annual Grand Cru event. As leisurely as it sounds (and looks: we taste outdoors on the lawn – made difficult this year by tropical temperatures and humidity here in Poland) it is one of the Polish season’s high points.

Getting ready for grands crus.

As noted above, tasting circumstances were short of perfect and the more serious red wines suffered. Nonetheless it was exciting to get a snapshot of new and old(ish) vintages, and some valid confirmations. Mielżyński’s catalogue is strong on Bordeaux and the event has traditionally centered around an en primeur tasting of the latest vintage. I consider tasting months-old Bordeaux pure nonsense, and it was no consolation that the wines were a few months older (and importantly, final blends) here compared to the April trade tastings in Bordeaux that generate the plethora of Parker & Co. points. Anyway Phélan-Ségur 2008 was nicely curranty but curiously untannic, centered around what seems to be a major 2008 characteristic: fresh, zesty acidity. The best from Domaine de Chevalier was not its overoaked vanilla-scented 2008 but the following spell of honesty: On ne fait plus du raisin, on est sur le marché des bijoux. The nicest 2008 came from Kirwan, juicy, crisp and full of a rarely seen nervosité. But it was so much more exciting to taste the older vintages: Domaine de Chevalier 2001 suave, generous and with quality tannins; Phélan-Ségur 1996 evolved, animal and so satisfying for its bourgeois peerage; Kirwan 1998 (pre-Rolland by the way) balanced to the millimetre, very Cabernetish with a lot of reserve; and last not least, Palmer 2003 oozing luxe and a quality of oak you find in maybe five or six wines on this planet. Hmmm, I nearly got excited with Bordeaux.

Alberto Cordero di Montezemolo talks to Polish vintner Katarzyna Niemyjska.

But it was all forgettable compared to the Douro wines of Cristiano van Zeller of Quinta do Vale Dona Maria. I’ve never tasted an unbalanced wine here but the recent vintages have picked up even more depth and concentration (courtesy of old vineyards but also a more precise extraction than before, I guess). Even the 13€ red VZ is an utterly serious wine with plenty of substance and terroir definition; if I had an estate in the Douro I’d really be happy to have this as my grand vin. 2006 is rocking now but 2007 promises even better; it’ll be a truly memorable vintage. The flagship Quinta do Vale Dona Maria 2006 is thick as ink and very structured but already hints at superb balance of black fruits and minerals; it’s more convincing today than the 2007 which I’ve found a little atypical, more Mediterranean, low-acid, almost Grenachey than usually here. (But it was tasted under the 30C midday sun). The limited-production CV 2007 is a more seriously extracted beast of a red, but this too has gained depth and personality in the last vintage or two (not that it ever lacked either). These are ridiculously affordable wines that have never failed me, and to get them you don’t need to fight the en primeur battles with brokers from Moscow and Shanghai.

Here’s Cristiano van Zeller explaining the 2007 vintage for you:

http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/QJOiQ2_oB18&hl=pl&fs=1&rel=0&border=1

Having recently blogged on the Dobogó estate in Tokaj I’d only briefly mention yet another excellent dry Furmint from winemaker Attila Domokos: the newly introduced single-vineyard Szerelmi 2007 finds that elusive middle way of upper bracket Furmint; it’s rich but botrytis-free and not overripe, oaky but the use of second-year 400-liter barrels gives it a real sense of balance. Also an exciting mini-vertical of the Aszú 6 Puttonyos with a spicy, evolved but delightfully fresh 2003 (Domokos’ first vintage – now that’s really impressive), a perfumed, airy, against-the-odds 2005 and a truly stunning 100% Furmint 2004, clean as a whistle and invigoratingly citrusy, in a vintage when few makers had any grapes good enough to make a 6P.

In this weather, it’s perhaps little wonder oak-free crisp Rieslings performed best. Theresa Breuer of the Weingut Breuer was showing a range of bone-dry and mineral-deep Rheingau wines including the 2007 Berg Rottland that blew my mind last time; this time it was Berg Schlossberg that stole the show with a very subtle 2007 and a slowly maturing, beurre noir-flavoured 2002. Again, it’s difficult to think of a more reliable and honestly-priced estate than Breuer. Theresa speaks about the Berg Schlossberg bottling:

http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/TNC2BTvekR8&hl=pl&fs=1&rel=0&border=1

Another brilliant Riesling collection was presented by Roman Niewodniczanski of the Weingut Van Volxem in Saar. Saar is a microregion on the south-western outskirts of the Moselle, that in the last dozen decades has produced some spectacular sweet and sweetish wines courtesy of such vintners as Egon Müller and Zilliken. In 2000 Niewodniczanski revived a historical estate and set upon making quite a different style of wines: ripe, broad, concentrated, mineral, dry and dryish instead of sweet and far less zingy-acidic than before (mirroring, he claims, Saar wines as made in the 19th century when they belonged to the world’s most expensive). It’s a style that has been performed successfully elsewhere in Germany by estates such as Heymann-Löwenstein in the Lower Moselle, or Peter Jakob Kühn in the Rheingau. The stylistic agenda is controversial but qualitatively Van Volxem has been an obvious, and huge, success. We sampled through some young wines – 2008s are still in their infant stage (some unfiltered and very yeasty) but the Saar Riesling 2008 is already showing the impressive cruising speed this winery has reached in less than a decade, while the newly introduced Goldberg 2008 is certain to become one heck of a superconcentrated, almost brothy piece of mineral Riesling. The Saar Riesling 2007 is singing today. The highlight, however, was a series of aged magnums Roman brought for the sake of education and sensual delight. Bonjour mineralité with the Altenberg Alte Reben 2004 from 80–100-year-old vines, showing that unmistakeable salt & pepper signature of the Saar; a different balance with the sweetish Gottesfuss Alte Reben 2005 (16g of residual sugar), a broader, almost Pinot Gris-styled wine but not without balance and tension; fantastic drinkability and brilliant mineral zest with the Wiltinger Braunfels 2001: the most modest of these crus (and perhaps vintages too) and yet the most satisfying wine of the day.

Here’s Roman Niewodniczanski summarising his winery project in the Saar:

http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/UCxcgoliA1M&hl=pl&fs=1&rel=0&border=1

(More) Good Riesling

…including a truly great one

It’s quite some time after the event but I thought I’d blog on the May 21st Riesling tasting here in Warsaw. Co-organised by the German Wine Institute and our WINO Magazine, it’s part of a long-term programme to make Poles more aware of Riesling and how well it matches our Central European foods and brains.

There was an exciting tutored seminar followed by a walk-around tasting. The former showcased top dry wines (chiefly belonging to the Erste Lage / Grosses Gewächs category). Even the Schloss Vollrads Erstes Gewächs 2007 which I usually don’t like (this historical estate is underperforming in my book) showed well, rich but bone-dry, with a spicy, almost brothy mineral presence and very good balance to its weight; a wine that reiterates my adulteration for the 2007 vintage. Another positive surprise was the Domdechant Werner Kirchenstück Erstes Gewächs 2006. I have a lot of sympathy for the Domdechant estate and its owner Franz Michel, one of German wine’s most engaging personalities, but I vastly prefer their sweet Kabinett and Spätlese wines to their trockens. In past vintages, I’ve found the EGs overly soft, often with a strange sunflower oil oxidative character. This 2006 was quite delicious, with surprising acidity for the vintage.

There was also an interesting range from Kesselstatt from the Mosel, including a dry Scharzhofberger Grosses Gewächs 2007, saline and citrusy with a balanced dryness but lacking a bit of depth and dimension, that was overshadowed by the Josephshöfer Erste Lage Spätlese 2006. It’s only in the Mosel that you’ll see Erste Lage wines with a degree of sweetness (they can be labelled as Kabinett, Spätlese and Auslese as in the ‘traditional’ German progression of sweet wines), and in the jungle of German wine classification this is one particularly tricky combination: how to make the grand cru status of the vineyard evident in a sweet wine context where traditionally, the mineral identity of various crus was not a priority? This wine shows how to address the issue: it’s hugely rich with a honeyed, almost oily texture from the late-harvested grapes, but showing a strong acidic backbone and an obvious minerality that will develop over the coming years and make this a really interesting bottle.

There was a producer new to me: Weingut von Racknitz from the small region of Nahe. It’s one of those estates that make Germany such a vibrant and exciting wine country. They have no fancy Erste Lage (they don’t belong to the VDP club) but – judging from the four wines I’ve tasted – very reliable quality and value for money across the range. The wines are organic and the Nahe Riesling trocken 2008 for 7.50€ is a delightfully fresh, greenish, driven rendition of the grape, while the Niederhäuser Klamm Riesling trocken 2007 is really impressive in its mineral definition, lemony poise and perfectly gauged residual sugar. For 11€ each, there’s also the interesting pair of Schieferboden 2007 – an austere and backward dry Riesling from slate, harmoniously dry with good body – and Vulkangestein 2007 – a more peppery but eventually supple and approachable wine from Nahe’s rare volcanic soils.

Finally, there was a stupendous bottle of Riesling on show, one that made me shiver with emotion (and my wallet with panic at the inevitable expense of a case or two). The Georg Breuer Berg Rottland Riesling 2007 is as close to perfection as a young dry Riesling ever gets. With a little help from the vintage, this is a jewel of mineral depth and incisiveness with some essential fruit adorning the crystal-clear definition of slate. The palate is explosive with fantastic natural balance. Truly a wine to buy and try before you die. Funnily, when I visited Breuer last August this Rottland was the least exciting of their cru wines…

The Berg Rottland vineyard photographed from Bingen across the Rhine.

Huba Szeremley Rajnai Rizling 1998

Black rock wine

Badacsony wine (right) and black basalt rock (left).

I needed a very mature dryish Riesling to serve with food today, but couldn’t find anything from Germany in the cellar. Opened this instead. We are on Lake Balaton in central Hungary, where five million years ago huge volcanoes were fuming and lava was everywhere. Years later, the solidified volcanic matter is creating a unique terroir of pure basalt rock. Add the Balaton’s mitigating climate and you have one of the potentially most exciting white wine-producing zones in Europe. Its potential is rarely realised, though, as the local minds are still suffering from the shattering effect of Communism.

One guy who has more than anybody worked for the revival of Badacsony (as this volcanic area on the north-western shore of the Balaton is called) is Huba Szeremley. His 100-hectare estate is a model of the 1990s Hungarian investment. Apart from grapes – ranging from traditional Riesling and Pinot Gris through modern blocks of Merlot and Syrah up to experimental parcels of the rare autochthon varieties of Kéknyelű and Bakator – there is also a herd of historic Hungarian cattle and mangalica pigs, a good restaurant, an open mind, and a lot of projects for the future.

I have followed the wines of Szeremley closely for many years and the most exciting have consistently been the traditional Kéknyelű (a fantastically rich, extractive grape with outstanding minerality) and Szürkebarát (Pinot Gris), but their success has too often eclipsed the fine results that can be obtained on the Balaton with Riesling (called Rajnai Rizling locally). A solid acidic base coupled with long even ripening and a clear peppery minerality for the basalt does sound like a winning Riesling combination.

Szeremley has chiefly used his Riesling vineyards for the inexpensive blended Rizling Selection (where ‘Rajnai’ is coupled with a majority of Olaszrizling, or Welschriesling) but has occasionally bottled a varietal version. The 2005 is a little light but finely poised with a good mineral signature of the Badacsony terroir, while the 1997 félédes [semi-sweet] is an opulent take on a German Auslese style with plenty of richness balanced by age, lemony acidity, and basalt.

This 1998 Badacsonyi Rajnai Rizling félszáraz [semi-dry], now fully mature with a deep colour, is a successful dryish interpretation. With a bit of Firne aged Riesling character, complimented by honey, sweet peach and spice, this is not terribly complex but surely interesting. Palate is rather on the dry side, with good fruit but also a bit of underripe green tartness; on the other hand also some obvious Badacsony basaltic minerality. This has aged well and is not declining yet (courtesy of the green acids clearly), and perhaps showing marginally better than at my previous tasting of this very wine in June 2006. While this is far from perfect and lacking a bit in depth and dimension, it shows the great potential of the Badacsony vineyards for top white wine production.

Kéknyelű vines under the basalt outcrops at the top of the Badacsony mountain.