Wojciech Bońkowski
Master of Wine

Wine and tea (2)

Wine and tea: they actually have a lot in common. In the second installment of this seminal article I look at the production process of wine and tea and how possibly they can be similar.

Getting Baijiguan

I got this nice gift from a fellow tea lover in Poland: four neat 8-gram packages of Baijiguan. China’s most famous oolong tea, the king of Wuyi cliff tea, still made from the original millennial tea trees or their direct clones.
Incidentally this is one tea I’ve never tasted before. I’ve had the other three of the Four Famous Bushes: Dahongpao, Tieluohan and Shuijingui, but not Baijiguan. On anybody’s way of tea, it’s good to have a goal out there to reach.

So it was with excitement that I opened the bag. It will take a better grasp of Chinese than mine to decipher the info on the bag; all I know is that this tea is from 2010. At first sight this is a very surprising tea. It has a very low roast and the leaf is a mix of various light greens – way less oxidised than the norm in Wuyi. Apparently this is typical of Baijiguan, but how to approach this? (See here for photos of Shuixian, a typical Wuyi tea). The leaf aroma is very subdued with hay and toasted bread. 


On my first attempt I dumped the entire bag – 6.8g of leaf after sorting out the debris – into a 100ml gaiwan. Treated like all oolongs with boiling water and perhaps 40 seconds of steeping this tea was frankly unpleasant. A murky light beige colour, very little aroma in the cup and a completely flavourless palate ending rather bitter. The next few infusions were no better. I had obviously mishandled this tea but was nonplussed by the profile with a mixture of low and medium oxidation leaves this tea tasted like an unsuccessful modern Darjeeling. To save the day I quickly brewed some 2008 Shuijingui – Baijiguan’s marginally less famous sibling – that I bought from Dragon Tea House. What a good tea! Wuyi at its chocolatey, honeyed, high-roasted best but also with an unusually intense plummy fruitiness – outstanding.

It was only after 7 or 8 infusions, with the leaves fading away that the BJG revealed some pleasant low key elegance and an almondy flavour distantly reminiscent of Dancong oolong. So there was hope, I thought. For my next attempt I halved the dosage and used an excellent quality shipiao clay pot from Taiwan I usually dedicate to Dancong from Tea Masters. Following my experience with Dancong I also used very brief infusions at the beginning: starting with perhaps 8 seconds. The result was far, far better than my first attempt in gaiwan. Very light in colour. Partly thanks to the clay pot that emphasised the fruity notes rounded off the whole, but partly after the brewing parameters helped the tea’s finesse come forward, this Baijiguan now showed some real textural interest with light notes of white almonds, dried fruits, a bit of dried herbs; bitterness was never allowed to dominate in any of the ten infusions. The patience was also good, although in all truth it’s a rather light tea that never delivered a very intense flavour. 

I still have my reservations about this: looking at the expired leaf I think the oxidation is a bit random, with some bruised leaves and some totally green; it just doesn’t seem so well handled. The lack of flavour intensity especially at mid-palate is a problem. But when ‘got right’, this tea at least has personality. It comes closer to a Dancong than other tea varieties in Wuyi. 
Disclosure
Baijiguan was a gift from a friend (not ITB). Shuijingui and the shipiao pot were my own purchases.

2008 Dahongpao

Dahongpao is one of the four classic oolong teas of the Wuyi region. A status roughly equivalent to a Burgundian grand cru such as Richebourg or Clos de Tart. Accordingly, there are many imitations that make you wonder what the fuss is about. This expensive Dahongpao shows why the reputation is well deserved.

2008 Rougui

Let’s continue the Wuyi theme with another classic tea from this region of China: Rougui. The name means ‘cinnamon’ (in the meaning of ‘cassia’)
and refers, predictably, to the heady spicy aroma exuded by both dry leaf and
brew.
While not as ubiquitous as Shuixian, Rougui is
a fairly common tea. This example from 2008 is again from the Dragon Tea House
on eBay, and I bought for the extremely modic sum of $8 / 100g (interestingly,
the 2009 now on
offer
at this merchant has increased to $18).
This is proper tea: it becomes obvious as soon
as you look at the leaves. They are long, intact, and well taken care of. There’s
a distinctive and nicely nuanced spicy aroma, perhaps of cinnamon tree bark if
you insist. Far less roasted and chocolatey than your usual Wuyi tea, and
surely less than either of the Shuixian I reviewed a few days ago. The tea’s
medium body and moderate roast are also obvious in the colour, which is never
darker than a deep orange-amber.
The tea’s ‘attack’ when you take a sip into your
mouth is strongly spicy, indeed redolent of powdered cinnamon, but the whole is
not very distinctive in flavour: from mid-palate on it recedes into a fairly
vague Wuyi typicity, before a well tannic and perhaps slightly mineral finish.
I have found that the most enjoyable sessions are those with a very high dosage
(6–7g / 100ml of water) and short infusion times. There’s never much roast in
the foreground but a very strong spiciness especially in the first infusion
(later, it tends to wane rather quickly).
The short-livedness of the cinnamonny aroma and
the somewhat cloudy appearance led me to think this tea could actually be
a fake. I mean a tea artificially flavoured with powdered spice. Mind you,
should my intuition be confirmed, it’s been done in a fairly subtle,
well-handled way, but I couldn’t help thinking that heady tree bark aroma was a
little too obvious and disjointed to be really natural. (It’s fairly common to
see China’s most popular tea sbeing counterfeited by artificial aromatisation: ‘Milk
Oolong’ – see review here – is another frequent example). Looking at the wet leaf it
’s obviously a plantation tea: leaves are thin and fragile with litte structure, but processing has been good.
Dragon Tea House are a reputable merchant and I’m
keen to give them the benefit of a doubt on this tea, which if you disregard
where the spicy aroma is coming from, is actually a nicely balanced, moreish
tea that’s excellent value for money.

A Tale of Three Shuixians

Comparative tasting rocks. Tasting different things together is a perfect wake-me-up. You become more perceptive to the minute differences and analogies even of very similar things.
The setup.
I recently realised that among my 50+ tea reviews on this blog, one important tea family was still missing: Wuyi. ‘Cliff’ or ‘rock’ tea from eastern China’s Fujian. The Bordeaux of tea. Many, many tea drinkers’ favourite oolong. It’s not my favourite, but as every wine drinker with Bordeaux, I have several bins in the tea cellar, and enjoy them from time to time.
Shuixian (Western translation: Water Sprite) is the most popular and widely available oolong tea from Wuyi (and elsewhere in Fujian). It’s a generic name that refers both to a varietal of tea tree and to the style of tea that is obtained from it. As all Wuyi oolongs this is over 50%-oxidised  and medium- to heavy-roasted. Of all Wuyi teas, Shuixian is considered to see the highest roast, though as will all things tea this varies from producer to producer.
Here I have a comparative look at three Shuixians. One was purchased in Poland from online merchant eHerbata and I infer it’s a 2008; it cost the equivalent of 6€ / 100g. (Hereafter referred to as sample ‘A’). Shuixian ‘B’ is the 2008 Premium Laocong (‘Old Tree’) from Dragon Tea House ($20 / 100g; now available in the 2009 vintage). ‘C’ is the 2008 Traditional Shuixian from Jing Tea ($26 / 100g).
Dry leaf appearance is similar in all three. We have the typical Wuyi long, twisted leaves that vary in colour from very deep green to almost black, but mostly are medium and medium dark brown. There’s little qualitative information to be drawn from the visual aspect alone, other than ‘A’ and ‘B’ contain a varying proportion of broken leaf while ‘C’ is the most intact (something you can’t really see on the photo above). Also, A is altogether lighter in colour with a degree of light brown leaves; hard to say why for the moment but it’s a hint I’ll elaborate on later.
As is common practice with Wuyi oolong, I brewed these teas in a gongfu succession of very short steeps on a large amount of leaf (4.5g for 75 ml of water; 15s, 15s, 25s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 1m etc.). The colour of the first brew is rather similar:
Tea ‘A’ came out rather unpleasant. It’s dominated by roast, and tastes both a little stale and overbrewed, with an untasty wet wood and soaked raisin profile. Bitterish and tannic in an unpleasant, unclean way on the finish. Later brewings are a little nicer, coming close ot a black tea in expression with a mulchy, sweaty character. This tea has much deteriorated since fall 2008 when I bought it (at the time it was a basic but essentially correct and pleasant tea). And it makes me think it’s not necessarily a 2008 but perhaps an older stock.
Tea ‘B’ gives a solid performance. It’s a chewy, rustic rendition of Shuixian with little in terms of finesse, and it’s slightly dominated by roast. The reason I compared Wuyi tea with Bordeaux is not casual, as I tend to think of roast in teas as similar to oak in wines. Oak is very easy to overdo. In youth, many red wines are dominated by oak; some shake this off with ageing, some don’t. This Shuixian probably won’t integrate its roast even if you age it for years. It’s also a tannic, mildly astringent tea. Good quality here: at least tastes like the real thing. I particularly like the middle infusions here (#2–5), where the roast recedes a bit, leaving an impressive, almost physical thickness to this oily brew. Later, chocolate comes back again.
Tea ‘C’ is quite different from the other two. It has a delightful clean bitter chocolate aroma to the warmed leaves, and shows lighter than ‘A’ or ‘B’, especially in later infusions whose colour is never darker than deep amber. Never an overpowering tea, this seems less roasted, with the leaf oxidation influencing the profile. It’s quite assertive throughout the middle infusions, semi-rich and rather buttery than milky (milk-chocolatey is often used as a mouthfeel descriptor for Shuixian). A very enjoyable tea with a transparent, high-quality profile and considerable finesse for a Wuyi tea.
Here’s a photo of the final 20-minute brewing:
As you can see tea ‘C’ is quite lighter in colour while ‘A’ and ‘B’ still brew very dark. Let’s have a closer look at the expired leaves now:
Here the observations from the dry leaf and the comparative tasting find their final confirmation. ‘A’ and ‘B’ are showing a high amount of broken leaf, leaf fragments, and in the case of ‘A’ also of stems. ‘C’ has the largest and most intact leaves that are also the lightest in colour; they open almost completely, showing that the roasting was at its lightest and most skillful here (long, careful roasting preserved the leaves better while quick commercial roast in electric machines at high temperatures tends to burn the leaves). Tea ‘A’ has leaves of different colour that remain twisted and rolled: the poorest roasting shows here. ‘B’ looks almost as good as ‘C’ but the leaves are consistently fragmented. It’s a slightly lower grade apparently than ‘C’, although the cup is quite pleasant.
It was an interesting tasting also in how to buy teas. Whether on the internet or in a physical shop we’re often confronted with elaborate prose on a given tea’s origins, and few technical details on how it was actually made. ‘Premium’, ‘Supreme’, ‘Traditional’ are meaningless terms that add to the confusion. Looking at the dry leaf and, if you have a chance, at the expired one (some online merchants post photos of these) can reasonably help you make an educated purchase. But best is, of course, trying the tea before you shell out the $25.
2008 Traditional Shuixian (Jing Tea), expired leaf after 10 infusions.